You mention the unsubstantiated rumours regarding the people involved: "[...]] the girls being the daughter of a drug addict mother and were well known for causing trouble on the estate and the cameraman was an innocent Bulgarian migrant." -
I suggest that precisely such 'rumours' about girls - those two in Dundee, so many others across the years across the country in the grooming gangs scandal - are the 'excuse' we've heard from the 'elites' in police, politics, the media - making out that girls like that a trash and therefore of no account and can be disregarded, because: community cohesion.
It is sickening.
Let me note in passing that Bulgaria is a mostly islamic country.
And let me ask: what if this Scottish girl had been black instead? Would the bine-pensant, feminist 'elite' not celebrating her then? It's not just two-tier 'justice', it's two-tier racism. And we just let it pass and vote for the same representatives who swept all this under the carpet.
Greatly appreciate your calls for caution here... I am always concerned when these things get the media wind behind them, because their mythic dimensions outstrip the facts (which these days can be exceptionally difficult to establish, owing in part to the dearth of journalists).
If you care about typos, there are two here that leapt out at me:
I'm fortunate in that everything I run these days is scheduled weeks in advance, giving me stupid amounts of time to edit. And I *still* find silly mistakes on the third or fourth pass (like 'the the' and homonyms). 😂
Sorry white Britain - you can't wait for police or "the state" to protect your kids. If you don't care enough to do it yourself, you see what happens.
In the part of the world where I live, if a girl (from certain communities - those uninfected by liberal-progressivism) were arrested - for whatever reason - her community would be out in the streets attacking police regardless of consequences. (A case from around 12 years ago: a woman was arrested on spurious grounds; there were mass demonstrations including main thoroughfares blocked and people throwing heavy objects from balconies onto riot police in the streets below.)
You've already seen that the police are not on your side. If you care about your daughters, you have to protect them with your own bodies.
This is a situation where it seems likely that both individuals should be investigated by the police - the man because his behaviour is distinctly suspect, and the girl because she is carrying offensive weapons. I acknowledge that we, as a country, can no longer trust the police, courts, or government to act in our best interests, but the fact is that we have some of the most restrictive laws in the world against carrying weapons. I ask seriously, do we want to water them down?
You mention the unsubstantiated rumours regarding the people involved: "[...]] the girls being the daughter of a drug addict mother and were well known for causing trouble on the estate and the cameraman was an innocent Bulgarian migrant." -
I suggest that precisely such 'rumours' about girls - those two in Dundee, so many others across the years across the country in the grooming gangs scandal - are the 'excuse' we've heard from the 'elites' in police, politics, the media - making out that girls like that a trash and therefore of no account and can be disregarded, because: community cohesion.
It is sickening.
Let me note in passing that Bulgaria is a mostly islamic country.
And let me ask: what if this Scottish girl had been black instead? Would the bine-pensant, feminist 'elite' not celebrating her then? It's not just two-tier 'justice', it's two-tier racism. And we just let it pass and vote for the same representatives who swept all this under the carpet.
Greatly appreciate your calls for caution here... I am always concerned when these things get the media wind behind them, because their mythic dimensions outstrip the facts (which these days can be exceptionally difficult to establish, owing in part to the dearth of journalists).
If you care about typos, there are two here that leapt out at me:
"young mail ‘migrants’" --> male
"tas hard working Britons" --> tax
Please ignore or fix as desired.
All the best,
Chris.
Thanks.. good spot I was rushing to complete. I'll edit tomorrow
I'm fortunate in that everything I run these days is scheduled weeks in advance, giving me stupid amounts of time to edit. And I *still* find silly mistakes on the third or fourth pass (like 'the the' and homonyms). 😂
I wish they were 'mail migrants'. You could stamp them 'Unknown at this address. Return to Sender'.
Sorry white Britain - you can't wait for police or "the state" to protect your kids. If you don't care enough to do it yourself, you see what happens.
In the part of the world where I live, if a girl (from certain communities - those uninfected by liberal-progressivism) were arrested - for whatever reason - her community would be out in the streets attacking police regardless of consequences. (A case from around 12 years ago: a woman was arrested on spurious grounds; there were mass demonstrations including main thoroughfares blocked and people throwing heavy objects from balconies onto riot police in the streets below.)
You've already seen that the police are not on your side. If you care about your daughters, you have to protect them with your own bodies.
Like trying to extinguish a fire while some irresponsible idiot is heaving petrol at it...
This is a situation where it seems likely that both individuals should be investigated by the police - the man because his behaviour is distinctly suspect, and the girl because she is carrying offensive weapons. I acknowledge that we, as a country, can no longer trust the police, courts, or government to act in our best interests, but the fact is that we have some of the most restrictive laws in the world against carrying weapons. I ask seriously, do we want to water them down?